Paying for On-Call Coverage - Here we go again!

On Wednesday, May 21st, the OIG posted a new Advisory Opinion, 09-05 evaluating a poposed on-call compensation arrangement between a hospital and the specialists on its medical staff.   The Hospital proposed an arrangements where members of its medical staff who agreed to provide on-call coverage to the Hospital's emergency department on a schedule established by the Hospital would be compensated on a per encounter basis for encounters with those patients who came to the Hospital ED who were otherwise indigent and uninsured.

What makes this Advisory Opinion interesting is not the Hospital's proposed methodof paying the on-call physicians although it is creative and will be something I will propose to clients who struggle with how to do this.  Its not the fact the OIG felt that any on-call compensation arrangement would pass muster under an Anti-Kickback analysis, OIG has recognized that such arrangements can be necessary and appropriate in certain circumstances.  

It is the fact that the OIG seems to have given up on the idea of trying requiring that such arrangements be limited to areas where there are physician/specialist shortages.  OIG acknowledges that, "on-call coverage compensation potentially creates considerable risk that physicians may demand such compensatiion a s a condition of doing business at a hospital, even when neither the services provided nor any external market factor (e.g., a physician shortage) support such compensation."  But, despite this acknowledgement, OIG required nothing in the proposed on-call compensation arrangement to ensure that this was not a situation where the physician specialists were merely holding the Hospital hostage.

As a result,  we need to expect that more and more and more physician specialists will now demand that their hospitals pay them to take call coverage in the ED and will point to this Advisory Opinion as the basis for asserting that there are no compliance justifications or market force elements that might exist in the particular hospital's market to justify a hospital's refusal to make those payments.   At a time when more and more hospitals are operating at a net loss and without any extra income to cover such expenses, hospitals will be increasingly asked by physicians to find the money somewhere. 

EMTALA - Covering Emergency Call Through Community Plans

On July 31, 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its FY 2009 final rule for the Inpatient Prospective Payment System.   Included with in the manyy regulatory changes contained in this final rule are new provisions regarding the requirements of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA).  Among these are new rules for hospitals to develop "community on-call plans" as a means of meeting their on-call services obligations under EMTALA. 

The new rules allow for two or more hospitals to collaberate to develop a community on-call coverage plan that applies within a specific geographic area and divides the coverage of certain types of services between the participating hospitals at designated times.  Specifically, a formal community on-call plan among a group of hospitals needs to include:

  1. A clear delineation of on-call responsibilities for each hospital participatingin the plan;
  2. A description of the geographic area covered by the plan;
  3. the signature of an appropriate representative ofeach participating hospital;
  4. Assurances that local and/or regional EMS protocols include information on any such community on-call arrangements;
  5. A statement  from each hospital participating in the plan affirming their respective obligations under EMTALA to perform medical screening and stabilizing treatment within its capacity, and to comply with EMTALA transfer and acceptance of transfer requirements; and
  6. An annual assessment by the participating hospitals of the efficacy of the plan.

Hospitals subject to EMTALA who struggle to maintain adequate ER coverage of key specialty areas including orthopedic surgery, cardiology and neurology should review these new rules and evaluate the potential to work with neighboring health care institutions to take advantage of this new opportunity as a way to better serve their communities and ease the often unweilding burden on specialty staffing caused by the EMTALA requirements.